Hebraic-Believer Position Paper:

The "Lost" Tribes: Ephraim? Goyim? - Both?

http://tshuvah.weebly.com/hebraic-believer-position-paper-the-lost-tribes-ephraim-goyim---both.html

This issue has become quite a divisive subject over the last few years. But regardless of which side of this issue you take: I do not believe it is, nor should it be elevated to, a point of such contention that it causes Believers to break off fellowship and shun one another over it.

This "dogma" causes division I think, as people are too emotionally attached to their own position(s) to examine it circumspectly. It's kind of like when you find out something that you always thought was true your whole life is false, and it shakes your world view :-)

Let's examine some things that can be shown to be facts....

Israel, the Northern Tribes mostly as a whole were in the Diaspora, and their location was known in the first centuries A.D., (I say: mostly as a whole, as "some" came back, and "some" are shown being in Israel besides Benjamin, Judah, Simeon and Levi later.*[See Notes below]) Their identity was lost; however: I believe it is still represented in greater Israel to a lesser degree. Many are not identified with Israel, but were lost amongst the Goyim/Gentiles.- YHVH ONLY knows who they are for sure. The two sticks are both together today (as no one except the Cohanim know for sure who they are) - and yet the two sticks are shown as still being brought together again later - as the lost come in with the Goyim who come into the Congregation of Messiah, - both in Gentile expression and Messianic-Judaic expression, as grafted into the root of Israel. One could perhaps say then of the "grafted-in" branches: some are wild, and (YHVH knows who's who): some are "natural" that were grafted into (so to speak) the Wild Olive Tree when they went into dispersion, so that they had taken on the identity of the "wild" and not the natural; so that they were cut-off - but have not (in a way) lost their identity as natural, (noting their parents who left of course), but have grown up in the "wild" so to speak.

So far nothing too controversial just basic observation of history and what Scripture plainly says; but then the problems start to arise...

Some say that if you are a Believer and start going to a Messianic Congregation that you HAVE to be of physical descent of the literal children of Israel. - This is not so. While I'm sure there are "SOME" who are physically Israel (YHVH knows who's who) - there are others who are not. Else how could the Goyim/Gentiles of the "wild olive tree" be grafted into Israel during the 1st two centuries A.D. in the first place! And what about the Scripture that talks about the Goyim/Gentiles/Nations  bringing their glory into Yerushalayim during the 1000 year reign of Messiah - etc.... Or that as AVRAM believed YHVH (as a Goy/Gentile) and became AVRAHAM and the father of "the Jews" by Covenant through FAITH - so to do the Believing Goyim become children of Believing Avraham! All kinds of doctrines get skewed if ALL people who go to a Messianic Congregation suddenly HAVE to be physical descendants of Israel. Even history and the Talmud and the New Covenant show us that their were two types of GOYIM - (not Israel in Diaspora) - that became Ger and Gar Tzadukim. Those who converted, and those who were "proselytes of the gate": ones who kept Torah, yet did not become circumcised and thus part of Israel in the flesh. That of course addresses conversion, but the point is they were GOYIM. Also, if the wild are really ALL natural, then there would be no point of the darash that Rav Sha'ul/Paul gives and thus no need to identify the wild as "grafted and commonwealth" AFTER they are grafted in - if they're only a re-grafting of the natural who "thought" they were wild! This sounds rather convoluted I must admit, but honestly think this through and I think that it will become clear.

So... what can one say then? - Some in the Root of Israel are Natural that Believed and remained; some are grafted in of the wild Nations/Goyim that hold to a more Gentile expression (as in we see in Corinthians); some are grafted in that are of the wild Nations/Goyim that embrace Torah-Judaism but remain "Gentile" (in the good sense of the word Goyim - as simply meaning: 'Nations') - as we see in: the "Gar Tzadukim" or "Proselytes Of The Gate" as Talmud talks about and the New Covenant notes; and some are grafted in that were amongst the wild that were really natural way back with pysical Israel (these may or may not embrace Torah fully however, depending on how closely they listen to YHVH) - and finally some of this group "MAY" -(and I stress MAY) be led to become circumcised to re-identify with Israel. -[BUT: This must ONLY come about as the Ruach-HaKodesh/(Holy Spirit) leads, and NOT on their own volition. Otherwise they are violating the injunction: "...Let every man abide in the same calling wherein he was called...." - 1Cor.17:17-24. - Although we do have and example contrary to the rule in Scripture with Timothy. And we also note that Avram, as a Gentile, was specifically told to become circumcised by YHVH, not by man.]

Now, this group needs to also be further broken down into two categories: those who are of "Judah/Jews" who find out that they are Jewish and their parents/grandparents didn't tell them - or didn't even know themselves - (there are been several cases of this that I've seen); - and the second group that "MAY" be of Israel from the dispersion who don't/can't know except from direct revelation from YHVH. Why do I say "direct" revelation? - Because there are those who say that you are automatically of Israel, yet this can be show to be false premise. In this case, the best advice I could give is: MAKE SURE YOU ARE HEARING FROM YHVH! - and not just your own desire to be "natural" Israel, so that your emotions in this matter will not allow you to examine the possibility that you are a Righteous Gentile Believer - a "Gar" Tzadukim" (yet not a literal "Ger") - one who desires to keep Torah, but are grafted-in from the wild, and not specifically "Israel", yet still part of the "Commonwealth of Israel", a child of Avraham, and in the Root of Israel in Messiah Yeshua. Remember, Israel is brought back to the land 'from' the Nations, but Israel is not 'the Nations' - else the whole world would be "Israel". When the Goyim are grafted into Israel, they are "of" Israel, and a child of believing Avraham - but are admonished to fear lest they boast against the Natural Branches. That is one danger one can enter into if one is not circumspect in this "dogma".

So, everyone is right :-) - unless you say that your slant alone is right, then you're probably wrong :-)

...However: A serious problem arises when 2 House teachings are in the extreme that are not constrained by the literal Word of Scripture (which is where some have entered into error) and borders on British-Israelism & Replacement-Theology falsehood. - I've heard some 2 house teachers who I agree basically with the majority of what they say; and then there are others who call themselves 2 house I don't agree with most of what they say. - Discern by the Word - "...yea, let Elohim/God be True, but every man a liar; as it is Written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged." - Rom.3:4b.

The following is an very important article that also gives some circumspection that touches on this subject....

https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=326008353626


Shalom

*Notes:
 {via public Email an on: [email protected]}
{...}
Nachmanides discusses these prophecies and distinguishes between them. Just as part of Judah was exiled with the northern tribes so too did some people from the ten tribes remain with Judah. Their descendants are now to be found amongst the present-day Jews. The overwhelming majority of the Ten Tribes however were exiled by the Assyrians and NEVER returned though they are destined to do so. The Ten Tribes (said Nachmanides in ca. 1260 CE) are still in Tserefath (Gaul and its region) and "at the ends of the north."
{...}
They said in the Midrash Seder Olam: Of those who came into the Land in the time of Ezra the whole community together numbered 42,360. The total whose names are recorded however only numbered 30,360. What happened therefore to the missing 12,000? These were those from the other Tribes who came up with Ezra.
{...}
It also appears from the simple meaning of the text, that before the exile of the northern country by Senacherib there were gathered into the cities of Judah people from the neighboring tribes of Menasseh, Ephraim, and Simeon and these then dwelt in the heritage of Judah. Or . This explains what was said concerning King Josiah, "They delivered the money that was brought into the house of God which the Levites that kept the doors had gathered of the hand of Manasseh and Ephraim, and of all the remnant of Israel, and of all Judah and Benjamin" (2-Chronicles 34; 9). Prior to that time in the period King Asa it was written, "And he gathered all Judah and Benjamin, and the strangers with them out of Ephraim and Menasseh, and out of Simeon: for they fell to him out of Israel in abundance when they saw YHVH/The-LORD his God was with him" (2-Chronicles 15; 9).
{...}
Those from the Tribes of Ephraim and Shimeon from Israel that were present (2-Chronicles 35;18) with Judah were they who dwelt in the Land of Judah or perhaps to some degree also those who had dwelt in their own territories adjoining Judah and had fled to Judah. They are referred (in 2 Chronicles 35;18) to in a general sense as "from Israel" and not by their specific tribes since they represented only a small portion of their tribe. These are they who returned under Ezra with the Jews from Babylon. They were not expressly mentioned by their tribes since they were attached to Judah. They all settled in the cities of Judah. There was no Redemption for the Ten Tribes who remained in exile.
{...}
[Another authority however, Tosefot in Arakin 32;a, says that, "from each and every tribe a few returned"]. These few were not enough to be termed a tribe in their own right or even part of a tribe - due to their minority position they were included amongst the two tribes of Judah and Benjamin and dwelt in their cities.
 
Apologia & Doctrinal:

http://tshuvah.weebly.com/02272012hatethesinlovethesinner.html

THE STATEMENT "HATE THE SIN LOVE THE SINNER" is wrong as it stands unqualified (because there is only a thin line in the statement between Biblical truth and error):
     This post isn't about not showing love as Believers for the lost; rather it is about a misplaced or perverse type of love being substituted for "Agape Love"...
     While it is true that by nature we are all sinners; yet in a very important sense we are NOT called to "love" those who practice gross iniquity and evil. haSatan loves those who practice evil. Tolerance of evil is in itself evil, by the sin of omission. A tolerant soft-loving attitude displayed to those who continue to commit the most vile acts, does not do those individuals who practice wickedness any good...rather it harms them, quenches conviction, and enables and encourages them to continue to practice lawlessness. -
     The problem is those who want to be 'loving' but fail to abide in the distinction between Agape -vs- phileo 'love' by incorrectly substituting in application one for the other.
     We're called as Believers to be Sanctified apart from the world; but not as some kind of a 'world-conformed tolerant-hippie' ! :-)
 
NOTE: Here is my reply to someone who commented on this post I had put on my FaceBook profile page:
 ...Know us by our love for "one another"/Believers - that is Agape-&-phileo, not phileo-&-eros. Seeing our love for one another is a conviction when they don't have it, and it is not shown to them who remain in wickedness, and so it moves then to repentance and draws them to YAH's Love. - Showing a misplaced 'love', one convincing themselves they are walking in Apage-Love by doing so, has the opposite effect....taking away their opportunity for conviction and repentance. - Saying I don't really like what Hitler did, but I love him - is contrary to New Testament teaching. - As Agope Love is not phileo love, Love From Above is not worldly love. - That doesn't mean don't have compassion, concern for the lost...AGAPE LOVE. - But the misplaced love that exhibits extremes says things like: "I love terrorists, murderers, and rapists; I just don't really care for what they do" <- is perverse!...almost demonic sounding if taken to the extreme. - Yeshua Messiah loves the sinner, yet He drove the money-changers out of of the Temple with a whip. YHVH loves His creation, yet calls those His enemies who are apart from Him...yet He still loves...as Agape Love is circumspect; but worldly-love is myopic. We are called to walk in Agape Love at all times...but we are commanded to not walk in phileo (friendship) with the world-which Scripture says is enmity with God. We need to pray for discernment to know the difference.


NOTE: And I replied again to another’s comment:
…You see, there's one deadly difference between the Gospel that was still proclaimed in the 60's and early 70's; and the gospel that we hear from mega-church pulpits today....One deadly difference between the sloppy-agape love that's being preached today, and True Agape Love that Scripture talks about. -

     Even the song "just as I am without one plea" can be misleading in the way some preachers spin it today; as the song should be saying: 'Just as I've been with one major heart's plea...SAVE ME!'…As Yeshua/Jesus doesn't love those who are lost and in sin "just as they are", rather in the sense that: He loves them starting from where they are and inspite of where they've been! At first glance that sounds the same, but it isn't even close! The woman caught in adultery wasn't told to 'go and feel good about yourself just as you are' - she instead was told to "go and sin no more".  Messiah met people where they were at, but then immediately took them in His Love and lifted them from where they'd been. - He didn't say feel good about yourself as you are and come to Me. – Rather the message was: Confess your sins, repent/turn unto YAH from your wicked ways… <- And that was still a given in the 60's and early 70's; but it is not for the most part what we're hearing today.

     Now while: Condemnation not born of Agape Love is not True love, as that’s religious legalism apart from YAH’s compassion for the lost; yet love that holds no room for rebuke, conviction, confession and repentance is not Agape love either!...rather that is a worldly counterfeit love…a buddhist-style, hippie-type, feel good about yourself, peace love dove type of love maybe; but it is not Agape 

     What's your story?...during the 60’s I’m pretty sure I was a worse sinner than most. But back then I meet Christians who were genuinely concerned and approached me as I was, in True Agape praying that I’d turn from my wicked ways, and be Born From Above made a new creation; but they didn’t accept me unSaved into their midst as an equal, telling me to just feel good about myself and tolerating an unrepentant lifestyle…they weren’t the type of modern Christians who’d welcome you ‘just as you are’ into their circle to feel better and good about yourself; rather: They were the type of Christians who’d have you sit in the middle of their prayer circle and pray for you to repent, confess your sins, and accept Jesus/Yeshua Messiah into your life !

     I love my kids, but there are some things I will not ‘tolerate’ them doing in my midst…that is true love and concern for them. – But I’m sure we’ve all seen some parents who want to appear loving, and who for the sake of that fake-love will let their kids continue in all kinds of wickedness and not even speak to them about it, so not wanting to come off as unloving…that is NOT Agape love!

     Fake-agape love –vs- True Agape-Love: On the surface they look similar – but they aren’t - one will only "love" you while it silently watches you march into hell !


And of some have compassion, making a difference: And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh. - Jude 1:22-23.


 
 
Hebraic-Believer Position Paper:

THE-NAME/HaSHEM -(The LORD)- YHVH

http://tshuvah.weebly.com/02232012thenameyhvh.html

HaShem or: YHVH – Part I:

As much as we'd all like to "think" we have the proper understanding of this - there is much more to it than you might think...

 Yes, many (not all) of the Orthodox will not use YHVH in writing, and in speaking many will say HaShem or Adonai instead.  Other Orthodox consider Adonai too Holy to use and say: AdoShem.  Sometimes you will see Rabbinic writings using YHVH in both English and Hebrew letters, in religious commentaries and discussions, and sometimes when quoting Scripture or directly discussing Scripture - since YHVH without vowels isn't pronounceable is one consideration.  Sometimes they just use "Yod-Hay" without vowels in Hebrew letters for a contraction (which is YAH with the vowels – and is in Scripture).   Some Orthodox will write and say Elohim, some others consider it too Holy to say and only say EloKim.   Some Messianics believe that one should only use Adonai or HaShem; Other Messianics believe that we are to Reverence His Name - and so believe that by not using It in praise and worship those who refrain are deliberately miss-pronouncing His Name (if you will) in that they are substituting something else where His Name should be used - such as when reading Scripture where it is used in the Text - and thus failing to observe the Commandment/Mitzvah to "Remember" Elohim's Name/YHVH to keep It Holy.  Some Messianics will only write YHVH when in Scripture or directly discussing Scripture - but as the writing or conversation approaches the mundane will then say HaShem (or some will then use Adonai) to refrain from taking His Name in vain; and of course most Messianics will be sensitive of this issue when speaking to the Orthodox.
  

 There is much evidence that "The Name"/YHVH of Elohim was used during David's time - and there is some indication that from about Ezra's time on (maybe from somewhat earlier during the captivity) that it ceased to be pronounced except in the Temple.  In Talmud it says that It was (came to be?) spoken only once per year during Yom Kippur by the high-Priest/Cohen-hagadol, and that then an angel would then come along and smack the people in the head so they'd forget how it was pronounced. 

 A very small child may mispronounce the term of endearment "Daddy", but the father is happy to hear his child speak to him in love.  I will not come between an earthly child and his father - so neither should we I'd think want to come between the Brethren and their heartfelt respect and love unto YHVH in the use of His Name - whether that manifests in them either speaking, or refraining from speaking, out of love and respect to their Heavenly Father - Romans 14 comes to mind.  Arguing in condemnation of the Brethren over another's use or non-use, or their possible miss-pronunciation, of Elohim's Holy Name/YHVH seems to me to be worse than their using It, or not using It, out of devotion.  So enough already!

Now: Discussion in love is one thing, where a matter is so important - yet when I see folks leveling condemnation upon one another for their heart felt and careful respect in their personal walk before YHVH in this matter, that is another thing, and grievous.

 To further clarify...

There are many things that are dogmatic that need clarification, even by heated exchanges, and especially lf ones dogmatic approach to Scripture in a certain areas approaches violating Doctrine and the weightier matters of the Torah.  I think everyone who knows me is aware that I'm one of the first to jump into such discussion when need be.  Then there are direct violations of Doctrine and the Mitzvot of Torah which must be addressed immediately and harshly if a more gentle rebuke is dismissed.  Yet there are disputable dogmatic matters, that are highly personal, that even though there might be a stronger position in the matter (of course - everyone thinks theirs is the stronger position - who really admits and says: I am the weaker brother!), those are just too personal to go beyond gentle discussion into an 'attack' mode, or condemnation, or ridicule of a Brother, whether they are the 'weaker' brother in these matters or the 'stronger' brother.  

 Over the many years that I've been a Believer - I've held three positions on this subject of The-Name/YHVH;  and each time, I was shown more, until I came to where I am at today; which now: I believe that I've heard more clearly from YHVH on this matter, but it took years of Him speaking to me till it made sense.  To use a mundane example: one very small child calls his father Da-Da, the little bit older child calls him Dad.  The older then tells the younger: his name is Dad - not Da-Da, the younger then says: No it’s not; then the older responds: yes it is so; and on and on - that is discussion, and that is fine.  - But should then the older (or the younger) child then say: I'm offended that you call Dad - "Da-Da", and you are wrong stupid - repent idiot (whatever - you get the picture), now then THEY have become the offender and are themselves an offense! - As they have offended their brother and set up a stumbling block before him.  Of all the things that fall into this disputable/dogmatic category that can cause an offense if not discussed in love for the Brethren - this is right up there at the top.  Dogmatic you'll say? - Yes, though many will not admit it: There is no dictionary in Tanakh that tells us exactly how to pronounce YHVH. / His Name. 

 But having said all that, personally, I don't have a problem with people using the Hebrew word "HaShem" (Lit. in Hebrew: TheName); but I do have a problem with someone using Adonai when reading Scripture when it is used to replace YHVH - when YHVH is plainly right there in the Scripture, such as when someone is doing the Torah reading.  So at least use HaShem if you feel so led, since you don’t believe you can speak the Name of YHVH; but don't substitute an entirely different word (Adonai or Lord). But even then would I condemn them if they do so, as some are so quick to do? -No- But as led I'd point out the above out to them.)  Why do I feel this way? Because it says YHVH ! And because while YHVH Alone is Adonai/(Lord), yet all others who are called with the title adonai (lord) are not YHVH ! - At least when one says HaShem they are acknowledging The-Name/YHVH; but when they say Adonai, when reading or quoting the Scripture directly where is says YHVH, they are not remembering The Name - rather, they are replacing The Name with another word entirely !  And that much should be obvious.

 Furthermore - the use of such variants as AdoShem and EloKim is less than about 50 or so years old anyway (HaShem has been used by the Orthodox for a long time though, and of course Adonai for centuries.)  Pick up The Agadah To The Babylonian Talmud for example by Rabbi Glick (I think that is where I remember seeing this) and you'll see that the English word Jehovah is used in the Rabbinic Orthodox commentary at times if I'm not mistaken - (It's been a long time since I've looked; but then - you'll even see some Orthodox Jews using Rev. as a title about 100 years ago too, but I digress :-) 

Now as was pointed out, we are not to offend someone if avoidable, such as in witnessing to the Orthodox. - Which brings up my conclusion. - Two will argue and say: I'm offended that you (say/don't-say, or pronounce, or pronounce incorrectly) The Name of God.  Well I'm offended at both of your offenses!  To me what one feels led to do in sincerity and love, as best as they know based upon what they believe Scripture says, in crying out in their heart to the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is between themselves and Him – and He will deal with how His children speak to Him Himself.  Now, do you have an opinion, even a contentious one, then use Scripture and and by all means share it - but don't hammer it ! - To use another mundane example: This particular subject is to me even more than on the level of my talking about making love to my wife, as far as this being a personal matter between me and YHVH.  Now, while I 'might' discuss the subject concerning my wife and I under certain circumstances - I'm sure not going to enter into a contentious argument about it ! 

So... guess you might just want to think of me as a referee giving a warning - that just perhaps: Entering into bitter arguments with your Brother concerning The Holy Name/YHVH of Elohim might just be bordering on taking The Holy Name/YHVH of Elohim in vain!  Maybe Yeshua Messiah did reveal The Name of YHVH to us - when He told us that "God is Love" - for if you speak those vowels into the Tetragrammatan you then will also hear echoed in the Hebrew: "Y`aHaVaH" - "God is love" - think about that for a moment!


Shalom

THE-NAME/HaSHEM -(The LORD)- YHVH – Part II:

While I think discussion on The Name of YHVH {HaShem} and the way It "might" be pronounced is fine - I believe that The Sacred Name of YHVH is too Holy for us as Believers in Messiah to argue over.

One think everyone agrees on (or at least they should) is that the proper way to say the contraction of YHVH is "YAH". All evidence shows that is the case; but...

I've heard some cut-down others for the way they pronounce YHVH (or don't pronounce YHVH) and that is just not right.  While there is evidence that it probably is pronounced either one of three different ways as presented by scholars (out of the couple dozen ways or however it could be pronounced!)  We still do not absolutely know.  And not knowing, (short of possibly ALL the ways being Holy as His Name is Holy), then it is wrong to put down others for how they call on YHVH out of a sincere heart.

For (but one) example...

Many years back, I read and article by a scholar of Hebrew
(I was sure it was Prof. Young, but I have since been unable to find the article) Professor Young, author of Young's Concordance and Young's Literal Bible Translation - who is one of the foremost Hebrew scholars in the last 150 years.  There are many people/scholars that insist that "Yahweh" is absolutely the correct way to say YHVH; however: Prof. Young proves in his article that saying the Hebrew letter 'vahv' as a 'w'  appealing to a "wav" imperative is impossible! - And thus "YahWeh" can't be correct (YahVeh by this criteria at best).

But I also believe that it is wrong to tell folks that they are in error for their sincere worship of YHVH using this form of The Name.  And what if it is YahWeh?!  Sure sure there is less proof for this specific two sylable form - but there are three forms of YHVH out there that have a very well reasoned argument (to one degree or another) for their usage.  (I'm sure that most on here have their favorite) - but it still is not 100% conclusive beyond controversy for any one of the three or so!  And I'm not going to take the position that one is in error - and I'm correct, when no one is 100% sure who is correct!  Even in: The Scriptures 1998, Institute For Scripture Research (PTY) LTD: Messianic translation of the Holy Scriptures {South Africa http://www.messianic.co.za} they couldn't 100% agree amongst their scholars as to the exact way of rendering It in English - and so just use YHVH in Hebrew letters.

Should we study it, yes, and I'll continue to study the issue myself. - But there are few arguments that could cause as much disunity in the Body of Messiah as this one (and judging by the things I see going on lately...oy!)  So let's be careful when we tell others that they're in error - or that the form of YHVH they use is perversion - when the issue is still dogmatic as it is not 100% proven - (except in some folks minds).

Again - there are scholars, Messianic included, on all sides of the issue of about 12 or so of the couple dozen or so ways to pronounce YHVH!  It doesn't really matter whether there is the in-the-middle contraction (as in Y'hoshua) or the end (as in Eliyahu) as we still just don't know, because in peoples proper names in Tanakh we only have a contraction! - Add to that that some believe it is probably related to Ehyeh from Exodus - yet we still don't know! -(While I personally like one way and believe it to be right, though perhaps two others are correct)-  I have read from Professor Young to bubkis, and the bottom line is: NO ONE is 100% sure! Even the Rabbis state that only Mashiach when He comes (again) will be able to reveal the correct pronunciation of YHVH – perhaps in this case they are right.

But I will offer something to consider... usually the notion is to error on the side of caution - having said that:  If one reads the Sacred Texts of Tanakh as they've been handed down from the Massoretic Scribes for the Name of YHVH - then they also can't be in condemnation for doing so. Even that Rabbi's say that it is permissible to read It as such  if one doesn't catch oneself in time to stop oneself. - (So here is consideration for those who say YHVH should be pronounced as: Yah'hovah or Yehovah.)-  So, did the Massoretic Scribes leave YHVH as It was to be used with vowels, and only "say" it was changed? - Some scholars also think this is so. - But again: Even that being the case, we still don't 100% proof this specific form is correct either (regardless of what some would tell you).

Lately some have been discussing the possibility that perhaps as YHVH is unique and Holy in Hebrew - so then all Hebrew vowels with it are Holy. - And I kind of like this reasoning - perhaps it is so.

One final thought...Some years back I was praying to YAH about this, and asked Him how He felt about those who mispronounce His Name. I believe He told me: Do you get upset when your small grandchild comes to you and says your name incorrectly?... No?...Neither am I upset when My Children speak My Name in love and praise and worship to Me.

But there IS one Biblical poetic form of His Name/YHVH used in Scripture, that I’d guess no one would disagree is correct, and that is: "YAH".

FaceBook URL to this article: https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150095837958627 


[NOTE: I didn’t get into the correct Name of Messiah in this note/study. – That is a separate issue, as we can determine and know that Yeshua is the correct form from several supportive evidences: Hebrew linguistics, historical and manuscript sources, etc… See below for a link of this subject.]...

NOTE: For a note/links/study on the Name Yeshua/(Jesus), see attached to this photo: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=420117271349122&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384&&src=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ash4%2F399050_420117271349122_975953416_n.jpg&size=899%2C659

 
In Yeshua/(Jesus) Messiah YHVH Elohim: A 'lost-sheep' found / From prodigal -To- Born From Above ! - My Testimony...

You may or may not believe what I’m going to share here, and perhaps think it is too incredible to be real, but I testify to you that this is the absolute truth!...

     As a young child of 4 years of age, I used to talk to YHVH and He would speak back in my heart and I could hear Him plainly, just as if I was speaking to someone in the same room. I’d ask Him questions that even adults ask themselves, and I heard the answers He gave me in response.  And one time, as a small child, Yeshua/(Jesus) Messiah even appeared to me visibly and spoke to me in my heart as He was there in the room with me, and I just knew that the way He’d appeared to me was in a specific way that it would not frighten me in the least (more on this later).

     As I grew into my mid-teen years, I eventually grew rebellious and was involved in the 60’s drug scene and got into false religions. One night, in late Nov. of 1971, I went to a “Jesus People” meeting and argued with them that they were wrong, and I tried to use false-religion arguments to prove my point. That evening as I lay in bed, I saw a blue light above me and heard a voice that said: ‘You now have the power to go to a higher plane of existence’…but that was a demonic manifestation. - Yet at that very moment, I felt a another Presence off to my right, and I said: ‘This channel is closed’-(me talking while still being under false-religious deception); but just then the Presence, which was the Holy Spirit of YHVH, walked through and into me like I was only a sheet of paper…and He spoke to my heart…He showed me a scene that had taken place when we’d first moved to Colorado in the early 60’s when-(and my brother and sister were also there)-I had asked my mother: “What is hell like”; and she answered me and said: “You never want to go there!”…and at that very moment lightening struck the tree just outside the window where we were!  - As the Holy Spirit brought this back to my remembrance and showed me this, He then spoke to my heart and said: “If you die tonight you will go to hell”.  - So I then turned to the wall, and remembering a picture of Jesus/(Yeshua) that I’d liked as a child that hung on my Grandparents wall, I said (to Jesus/Yeshua): “I know you are real”….At that very moment Messiah Yeshua/(Jesus) again appeared to me exactly as He had when I was a small child, as the Spirit of the Blood of the Lamb. It is hard to describe in physical terms, but He appeared physically somewhat as an arch/door, about the size of a man, softly shining crimson like the color of blood, as a door solid but translucent, but not transparent, and He had an unspeakably knowing-Love and quiet-Gentleness flowing from Him, it was just as He had appeared to me when I was 4 years old.  He spoke in my heart, and clearly said: “I know everything about you, I know every cell in your body”-(and when He said this, I could see in an instant millions of cells in my body like I was traveling down a mountain slope); and He said: “I know every thought you’ve ever had or ever will have, and I love you.”. – I then said to Him: “Touch me”…and He then moved to the foot of my bed and touched my feet. At that moment a wave that increased greatly in strength from my feet as it approached my head, of what I can only describe as an ‘electric tsunami of Joy’, flowed upward through and over me, until reaching my head, I then said loudly: “Wow!”…and I passed out.

     The next day I was delivered from drugs, false religions, and other worldly desires. Also the Bible now had become alive and made sense to me, where as for many of my teenage years I’d come to regard it as only a good book. – I went out that next day and started sharing what had happened to me with my Hippie friends.  Only a few seriously listened; fewer still somewhat understood, and just a very few believed in Messiah Yeshua/(Jesus) themselves.

     That was over 40 years ago….A generation has passed since then. – And now as we see the Signs of the Prophecies of Scripture coming to pass all around us, time is swiftly running out for this last End-Time generation. He cares for you too. Will you seek Him? Even if you are weak, yet He hears even the faintest cry of the heart that turns to Him….

     ¶  Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you: For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened. – Matt. 7:7-8.

     And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the Water of Life freely. – Rev.22:17. 

        Teachings / Blog

    Categories

    All
    Apologia & Doctrinal
    Biblcal Holy Days & Observances
    Hebraic Position Papers
    My Testimony
    Prophetic End Time Events
    Questions & Comments
    Thought For Today

    Archives:

    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012

    Author:

    Tshuvah, WarReport, Israelshomer, Wm Ben-Carl


    /

    [DISCLAIMER: Commentary, comments, and articles on this WebSite site (and all other associated sites, pages, groups, websites, etc. in general) may contain some unverified Intel. or content, and likewise some of these articles comments and commentary may not necessarily reflect the opinions of the owners &/or administrators of this site. - Yet they are given nevertheless for informational purposes for your careful consideration with the assumption that you have enough discernment to decide for yourself what is true and what is not; and so they are given at least to show the views of what various people are saying today - regardless of whether their premise, facts, and conclusions, are valid or not.

    The articles/views given in this site do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of the owners and/or administrators here nor anyone associated with it, and are given for informational purposes.

    FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may (or may not) contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Should this happen to be the case: We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site(s) is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site(s) for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner(s).]

    (PRIVACY NOTICE {Also extended to this site and all associations, sites, and parties as mentioned/noted above}:

    Warning--any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited... to the United States Federal Government also using or monitoring/using this site or any of its associations (defined above), you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/ or the comments made about my photo's or any other "picture" art posted on my profile. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law.

    Further I/(we) affirm the following:

    Amendment IV, United States Constitution:

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.)

    \

    יְבָרֶכְךָ יְהוָה, וְיִשְׁמְרֶךָ
     
    יָאֵר יְהוָה פָּנָיו
    אֵלֶיךָ, וִיחֻנֶּךָּ


    יִשָּׂא יְהוָה פָּנָיו אֵלֶיךָ, וְיָשֵׂם לְךָ שָׁלוֹם

                ~
    ישוע המשיח הוא יה
    את-הדבר
     
    אלוהים
      
     

    Mezuzah:
    And Yeshua answered him, The first of all the commandments is, ¶ Hear, O Israel: YHVH our God YHVH is One: And thou shalt love YHVH thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. - And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these. (Deut. 6:4-5 & Mark 12:29-31)